When treating knee diseases with prostheses, patients are often faced with the decision between sled prostheses and total endoprostheses. Both options have their own advantages and disadvantages, and it is important to understand the differences between them in order to make the best choice. In this post, we compare sled prostheses and total endoprostheses and discuss which might be the better option.

Sliding prostheses: A partial prosthesis for targeted diseases

Sled prostheses are partial prostheses that only replace the affected area of ​​the knee joint. They are often used in patients whose knee disease is limited to a specific region of the knee joint, such as medial or lateral gonarthrosis. Sliding prostheses offer the advantage of removing less bone than total endoprostheses and therefore can often result in a quicker recovery and less postoperative pain.

Total endoprostheses: A comprehensive solution for advanced osteoarthritis

Total endoprostheses replace the entire knee joint with artificial implants. They are often used in patients with advanced osteoarthritis or complex knee diseases where a partial prosthesis is not sufficient. Total knee arthroplasties provide a comprehensive solution for restoring knee joint function and can provide good long-term stability and mobility.

Comparison of advantages and disadvantages

The main advantage of sled prostheses lies in their targeted application and the preservation of the natural anatomy of the knee joint. They can result in faster recovery and reduced postoperative pain, but may not be suitable for patients with advanced osteoarthritis or complex knee conditions. Total knee arthroplasties provide a comprehensive solution to advanced osteoarthritis and complex knee conditions, but often require a longer recovery period and can represent a greater surgical burden.

Individual advice is crucial

The choice between sled prostheses and total knee replacements depends on a variety of factors, including the patient's individual anatomy, the severity of the knee disease, and personal preferences. It is important to have a thorough consultation with your orthopedist to discuss your options and make the best choice for your individual situation.

Conclusion

The decision between sled prostheses and total endoprostheses is an important and personal choice that should be carefully considered. Both options have their own advantages and disadvantages, and the best choice depends on the patient's individual needs and goals. By understanding the differences between sled prostheses and total endoprostheses and speaking to Prof. Kutzner at ENDOPROTHETICUM about your options, you can make an informed decision that meets your individual needs.