The implantation of an artificial hip joint, also referred to as a hip totalendoprosthesis (hip-tep), is one of the most successful operations in modern orthopedics. Various methods for anchoring the prosthesis are available: the cemented and cement -free fixation. Both techniques have specific advantages and disadvantages that should be weighed down depending on the individual patient conditions.
In this article, the two procedures are presented comprehensively, their respective areas of application are discussed and important decision criteria are explained. The aim is to offer a well -founded basis for decision -making for patients and doctors.
The hip joint is one of the largest and most stressed joints in the human body. It consists of the spherical thigh head (Caput femoris) and the pan (acetabulum) in the pool. A complex interplay of cartilage, ligaments, muscles and articular fluid ensures stability and smooth movement.
Turnover symptoms such as osteoarthritis lead to pain, restrictions on movement and ultimately to the need for a joint replacement.
Modern hip prosthetics has had a long development. The first attempts with artificial joints go back to the early 20th century. In the 1960s, Sir John Charnley revolutionized the endoprosthetics with the introduction of the cemented prosthesis. Cement -free models were later developed that enable biological integration of the implant in the bones.
Today the latest materials and techniques are available that have significantly improved the durability and functionality of the prostheses.
In the cemented hip-TEP, the prosthesis is fixed with a bone cement in the thigh bone. The cement (polymethyl methacrylate, PMMA) hardens within minutes and creates an immediately resilient connection between the implant and bone.
In the case of cement -free technology, the implant is connected to the bone by a specially coated surface. This porous structure promotes the growth of the bone and ensures stable, biological fixation.
A combination of both methods is the so-called hybrid technique. For example, the hip pan is cement -free and the shaft is implanted. This technology can combine advantages of both methods.
The choice between cemented and cement-free hip-free depends on several factors:
The right post -treatment plays a crucial role in the success of the prosthesis. Physiotherapy, targeted strengthening exercises and a gradual increase in the load are essential for an optimal function of the new joint.
Both methods are justified and should be individually coordinated with the patient. The cemented fixation offers immediate stability, while the cement -free variant enables long -term biological integration. Detailed advice from the treating hip specialist is essential to make the best decision.
You are welcome to make an appointment either by phone or online .
PROF. DR. MED.
KARL PHILIPP KUTZNER
SPECIALIST IN ORTHOPEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY
SPECIAL
ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY
SPORTS MEDICINE
EMERGENCY MEDICINE
SPECIALIST IN HIP AND KNEE ARTHROPLASTY
PROFESSOR OF UNIVERSITY MEDICINE AT JOHANNES-GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY MAINZ,
TEACHING COURSE FOR THE SUBJECT
OF ORTHOPEDIC
ENDO PRO THETICUM RHEIN-MAIN
SPECIAL PRACTICE FOR JOINT REPLACEMENT AND JOINT SURGERY
AN DER FAHRT 15
55124 MAINZ
TEL: 06131-8900163
FAX: 06131-9012307
E-MAIL:
INFO@ endo pro theticum .de
www.KURZSCHAFTPROTHESEN.de
www.PROF-KUTZNER.de
All rights reserved |
Prof. Dr. med. KP Kutzner
PROF. DR. MED.
KARL PHILIPP KUTZNER
SPECIALIST IN HIP AND KNEE ARTHROPLASTY